{ "title": "Balionline · finish the website and CRM", "purpose": "Approved execution is RUNNING. Complete all seven deliverables and 32 checks. Previous evidence is retained and checked against current state.", "run_id": "analit-completion-ll2-20260930", "session_id": "01a0f454-ebc5-7781-8ff2-8901227106a1", "updated_at": "2026-10-01T07:52:48.543613+00:00", "execution_state": "running", "current_state": "RUNNING: sixteen outcomes accepted. Fresh deployed newsletter visual repairs pass. The task native-consent daemon is stopped at09:41Budapest and confirmed unregistered, with durable authentication quiet until10:49 while clock/restart tests and review proceed. SQL collation/HTML queue transport correction remains active. Existing cPanel PHP/WordPress execution route is proved. Client-reported repeated logins, finished QA rows and a real threefold enquiry have separate assigned causal/cleanup investigations. No real duplicate cause or cleanup completion is inferred from generic tests. Original32 outcomes preserved; protected positives, automatic activation, measurement and settled importer lifecycle remain open.", "inputs": [ { "id": "readable-test-inbox", "label": "Accessible QA inbox", "state": "confirmed", "detail": "Matt authorizes changing the notification recipient for testing to an inbox we can read. Restore production routing afterward." }, { "id": "automatic-source-workaround", "label": "Automatic URL workaround", "state": "confirmed", "detail": "Matt requests a practical workaround in the contract. The full URL must remain usable in CRM, with all campaign parameters." }, { "id": "captcha-testing", "label": "CAPTCHA testing", "state": "confirmed", "detail": "Matt authorizes solving CAPTCHA and temporary disablement if needed. Restore protection and verify it. Do not repeat the old CAPTCHA authorization question." } ], "desired_state": "Visitors can submit the approved forms. Staff can read every supplied detail, correct period/type, full source URL and form location on one CRM request. One logical submission produces one linked request and one notification. New submissions and newsletter consent work correctly.", "deliverables": [ { "id": "d1", "name": "D1 · Finish the hero and restore the original styling", "bullet": "Finish the website fixes and verify them on the live pages.", "current_problem": "Approved hero/style/controls and authentic chat motion are accepted on fresh evidence. Required protected form outcomes remain separately open.", "proposed_change": "Keep the approved hero copy and form. Restore the original background, spacing and chat animation. Retain the smaller card title, correct fonts, left alignment and uniform buttons.", "visible_at": "Live collection page hero and chat, plus the 10-night trip page.", "representative_test": "At 1019×1164 compare alignment and spacing, use both hero buttons, and open/close the chat.", "criteria": [ { "id": "u01", "requirement": "U01 · On the live collection hero, show “CSOPORTOS UTAK ÉS SZEMÉLYES TERVEZÉS”, H1 “Válassz csoportos utat, vagy kérj saját útitervet.” with “saját útitervet.” in orange, and card title “Add meg az igényeidet, és keresünk az opciókkal!”. Make the card title smaller and legible without shrinking the H1.", "verification": "Check exact DOM text and loaded style at 1440×1000, 1085×1174, 1019×1164 and 390×844. Compare the card title with the rejected version and retain usable postdeployment images.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/postfix-desktop-report.md", "note": "PASS: complete fresh postdeployment desktop and mobile direct raster/DOM reviews at1440×1000,1085×1174,1019×1164,390×844 prove exact hero copy, orange phrase and smaller legible card title without shrinking H1. Loaded collection styles remain unchanged by the separately deployed observer/backend corrections. Combined mobile evidence: postfix-mobile-report.md. Root CTA receipt: hero-cta-exact-copy-browser-receipt.json." } }, { "id": "u02", "requirement": "U02 · “ELŐRE MEGTERVEZETT UTAK” reaches the trip list. “EGYEDI ÚTITERVET KÉREK” reaches and focuses the hero form. Under them show “Átbeszéljük az elképzeléseidet, és személyre szabott tervet adunk a kívánt időpontra, tempóra és programokra.”", "verification": "Activate both controls by mouse and keyboard on the live page and inspect the destinations and exact supporting copy.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/postfix-desktop-report.md", "note": "PASS: desktop mouse and keyboard, mobile touch and keyboard reach the trip list and reach/focus the custom-plan form. Exact rendered EGYEDI wording and support paragraph separately verified by root on the public page. Only custom-plan requires focus. No additional trip-heading focus requirement is introduced. Combined mobile evidence: postfix-mobile-report.md. Root CTA receipt: hero-cta-exact-copy-browser-receipt.json." } }, { "id": "u03", "requirement": "U03 · Restore the original hero background, layers, position and responsive spacing. At two-column widths the text and form start together, within 2 CSS pixels. At 1019×1164 the H1 and supporting paragraph align left with the CTA column. Remove the newly introduced empty space below the content. Mobile has a logical stacked layout and no horizontal overflow.", "verification": "Compare with the actual pre-change source, not the rejected screenshot. Record restored values, computed padding/background/alignment and postdeployment views at the four U01 sizes.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/postfix-desktop-report.md", "note": "PASS: authenticated original background/layers/position and responsive spacing match fresh desktop/mobile evidence. Two-column tops delta0px,1019 H1/support/CTA left aligned, mobile logically stacked, no horizontal page overflow or introduced lower gap. Combined mobile evidence: postfix-mobile-report.md. Root CTA receipt: hero-cta-exact-copy-browser-receipt.json." } }, { "id": "u04", "requirement": "U04 · Use the existing Protest Riot heading style for the H1, card title and “Milyen élményeket keresel?”. Body and fields use existing Open Sans. Keep Poppins only in its existing roles. TOVÁBB and submit buttons match the main hero CTA in font, color, height, padding, corners and interaction style.", "verification": "Check loaded fonts, computed button styles, hover/focus and working controls across all three steps. Check two untouched sections for regression. Different button widths due to wording are acceptable.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/postfix-desktop-report.md", "note": "PASS: fresh loaded Protest Riot headings/Open Sans fields and body, matched primary/form button computed styles, hover/keyboard focus and working Back/Next at all required desktop/mobile sizes. Untouched FAQ/testimonial/itinerary areas inspected for regression. Combined mobile evidence: postfix-mobile-report.md. Root CTA receipt: hero-cta-exact-copy-browser-receipt.json." } }, { "id": "u14", "requirement": "U14 · On the collection and 10-night trip pages, the chat panel grows from its button with the original morph/grow opening and closing motion, including the actual header and bottom-right variants. Chat remains usable.", "verification": "Compare original CSS/JS and capture a short live recording or timestamped sequence of opening and closing. Check message delivery through the controlled QA route. Keep existing reduced-motion behavior.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/homepage-final-desktop-report.md", "note": "PASS: authentic original .4-second bounce source restored, fresh timestamped opening/closing across home/collection/trip1440/1085/1019 and390 confirms grow from actual toggle, fitting controls and reduced-motion none. Actual visible header variants documented without inventing a missing historical header. Separate controlled chat delivery1935/1936 reconciled to CRM and one received notification. Normal protected pipeline remains open underM15." } } ] }, { "id": "d2", "name": "D2 · Finish the three-step form", "bullet": "Send the full travel request from the real form without losing any answers.", "current_problem": "The form is deployed, but complete accepted website submissions and all downstream values still need proof.", "proposed_change": "Keep both dropdowns, flight-inclusive budget, period controls and the four contact/question fields. Finish validation, data retention and real submit behavior. Keep cookie UI and measurement gates off as requested.", "visible_at": "Live collection form steps 1–3, its success state and existing measurement requests.", "representative_test": "Choose 2 passengers and 9-10 nights, go Back/Next, then submit a complete labelled request.", "criteria": [ { "id": "u05", "requirement": "U05 · Step 1 has the three experience choices, Kikkel utaznál?, and native dropdowns for Utasok száma and Balin töltött éjszakák. Passengers are exact integers 1–99 with a required empty “Válassz” start. Night options are 7-8, 9-10, 10-14 and 14+. Values survive Back/Next. Two passengers stay 2 and ranges remain ranges in CRM and notification.", "verification": "Inspect selects and options. Test empty passenger validation and step retention. Submit 9-10 and 14+ cases from the website, then compare CRM and delivered QA email. Never infer a passenger count or turn a range into an invented exact number.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/api-matrix-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: fresh desktop/mobile form QA proves exact native options, required passenger validation and Back/Next retention. Controlled CF7 fixtures preserve two passengers, 9-10 and separate14+ in CRM/received notifications. Normal protected website-origin completion remains open." } }, { "id": "u06", "requirement": "U06 · Step 2 contains current seasons, an optional more precise period or flexibility, accommodation, and a flight-inclusive budget in Ft/fő with “*a repülőjeggyel együtt”. Preserve the meeting budget range 800 000–1 600 000, step 50 000 and initial 1 200 000.", "verification": "Choose a valid current season, “2027. július közepe”, 4–5-star accommodation and 1 200 000 Ft/fő. Check Back/Next, displayed amount and exact CRM/email values. Generate future seasons appropriately, do not freeze all options to 2027.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/api-matrix-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: fresh desktop/mobile QA proves valid future seasons, optional precise/flexible period, accommodation and exact800000–1600000/50000step/1200000initial flight-inclusive budget with retention. Controlled fixtures retain July2027mid-period/4-5stars/1200000 in CRM/received notification. Normal protected website completion remains open." } }, { "id": "u07", "requirement": "U07 · The paragraph beginning “Általában legalább 7 éj / 8 nap Balin” and its leftover blank space are absent. The Bali-night label remains clear.", "verification": "Inspect steps 1 and 2 and check the removed text is absent from the form DOM.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/postfix-desktop-report.md", "note": "PASS: fresh full desktop/mobile form DOM and section images confirm removed paragraph and residual blank space absent, with a clear Bali-night label. Combined mobile evidence: postfix-mobile-report.md. Root CTA receipt: hero-cta-exact-copy-browser-receipt.json." } }, { "id": "u08", "requirement": "U08 · Step 3 has no “Elérhetőségek” heading. Name occupies a full row, E-mail and Telefonszám are side by side on desktop and stacked on mobile, and “Kérdés, kérés:” is a fourth, optional full-row field.", "verification": "Check at 1440, 1085, 808 and 390 CSS pixels. Type in the question, move Back/Next and verify retention. An empty question must not block submission.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/postfix-desktop-report.md", "note": "PASS: fresh1440/1085/1019/808/390 layouts show full-row name/question, desktop email/phone pair and mobile stack, no step3 heading. Optional question retains through Back/Next, required=false and empty question does not add a validation block. Protected positive submission remains separately open underU11/M15. Combined mobile evidence: postfix-mobile-report.md. Root CTA receipt: hero-cta-exact-copy-browser-receipt.json." } }, { "id": "u09", "requirement": "U09 · The existing CAPTCHA and required form privacy controls fit fully inside the white card and remain usable without clipping or page overflow.", "verification": "Read the actual existing CAPTCHA provider and mode. Inspect step 3 at the U08 widths. If that actual integration is invisible, document this fact rather than adding a new widget. Positive and negative functioning is verified under M15–M17.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/postfix-desktop-report.md", "note": "PASS: fresh1440/1085/1019/808/390 step3 inspection confirms original Cloudflare integration and required privacy controls fully inside the white card without page clipping/overflow. Desktop actual checkbox/loading UI and mobile host-without-iframe snapshot are recorded precisely. No additional widget was added. Positive/negative function remains assessed separately underM15–M17." } }, { "id": "u10", "requirement": "U10 · Site-wide cookie banners, settings buttons and preference dialogs remain temporarily absent. All measurement-consent gates remain temporarily disabled until Matt chooses to restore them. Existing page-view and successful-submit events run without a cookie click and without duplicates. “Igények összegzése” is absent. Form privacy, newsletter opt-in and CAPTCHA retain their own behavior.", "verification": "Check fresh, previously accepting and previously rejecting states across distinct page templates. Inspect relevant frontend and existing server measurement paths, network/provider events, and one real successful form event. Preserve exact backups and re-enable instructions. Do not invent visitor consent or automatically turn cookie gating back on.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/unchanged-inputs-receipt.json", "note": "PARTIAL: exact intentional cookie-off/measurement-gates-off sources retained. Existing success measurement code remains, but a genuine restored protected successful-submit network/provider event and its deduplication are not proved." } }, { "id": "u11", "requirement": "U11 · Missing or invalid required name/email/phone produces clear validation. A valid website submission shows actual success and transfers every form value, including Kérdés, kérés:, to the CRM card and one received notification. There is no demo alert.", "verification": "Run invalid and valid website cases, correlate submission ID with CRM readback and accessible QA inbox, and check for JavaScript errors. Record whether CAPTCHA was enabled or temporarily disabled.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/negative-contact-validation-server-receipt.json", "note": "PARTIAL: fresh background browser missing-field and malformed-email native validation observed. Actual original-protected CF7 endpoint returns validation_failed with explicit Hungarian missing name/email/phone and malformed email/phone errors. Both UUIDs have zero CRM requests. Controlled valid HTTP fixtures remain separate from a restored normal protected browser success and its CRM/email/measurement correlation." } }, { "id": "u12", "requirement": "U12 · The live collection page remains available at its public URL and displays the working three-step form. Every production change has a narrow backup, provider readback and practical restore path.", "verification": "Fresh anonymous HTTP 200, postdeployment behavior, exact changed-source readback and hashes. Use the proven WordPress code/provider route. A reversible fixture can verify rollback logic without needlessly rolling back healthy production.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/final-integrity-receipt.json", "note": "PASS: fresh anonymous collection/trip HTTP200, actual three-step controls, source byte/mode readbacks and private practical backups confirmed. Latest native pair7c1f70/b2772f and runtime pairf7f116/23fe22 deployed. Read-only runtime restore preflight passed. Every changed production source has guarded restore, preserving unrelated work." } }, { "id": "u13", "requirement": "U13 · All earlier and latest UI annotations have an explicit result on this board. Material visual defects are fixed and checked again after deployment.", "verification": "Run the required Luna section screenshot/fix/fresh-QA loop for changed website areas. Include desktop, mobile and 1019×1164. Reuse valid evidence for untouched areas. U14 needs motion proof and U10 needs measurement proof, not only still images.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/runtime-mobile-postdeploy-report.md", "note": "PASS: material newsletter defects are repaired and fresh native Luna xhigh reviewers inspected actual deployed desktop1440/681/680 and mobile360/390 direct pixels. Names, consent, widget and submit fit, no top-page sitekey errors, and mobile contact/FAQ/newsletter/footer runs pass. Valid untouched full desktop/mobile and1019×1164 section evidence is reused with source invariants. New unsettled desktop fullpage composition remains UNVERIFIED and is not acceptance evidence. U14 has separate motion proof; U10 measurement remains unchecked. All annotations retain explicit results. Reports: runtime-desktop-postdeploy-report.md, runtime-mobile-postdeploy-report.md; routing: runtime-luna-review-routing-receipt.json." } } ] }, { "id": "d3", "name": "D3 · Save a usable landing URL and the correct form location", "bullet": "Find an automatic workaround that preserves the landing URL and form location in CRM.", "current_problem": "Tested automated writers displayed literal & in multi-parameter URLs. Manual edits worked, but do not solve automatic intake.", "proposed_change": "Make the full submission-page URL visible and usable in CRM. Preserve query values and exact hero-form / oldalsó-form / alsó-form labels. Find and deploy a maintainable automatic workaround without waiting by default for vendor support.", "visible_at": "QlickCRM → Ajánlatkérések → opened request → Forrásoldal URL-je and Űrlap helye.", "representative_test": "Submit a campaign-tagged hero request and another real placement, reopen both cards, copy and follow their source URLs.", "criteria": [ { "id": "m01", "requirement": "M01 · The inventory lists each live page/form placement with URL, CF7 ID, collected fields, real available values and destination. Labels are hero-form, oldalsó-form or alsó-form only where those placements actually exist. Chat has its own truthful label.", "verification": "Refresh the existing 23-placement inventory only where changed. Include all routes creating enquiries and explain exclusions. Do not build a nonexistent side form merely to satisfy a test fixture.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/placement-inventory-current.md", "note": "PASS: fresh anonymous GETs on all 22 quote pages returned HTTP 200, retaining 23 actual placements, exact CF7 IDs, current fields/options, truthful chat label and newsletter exclusion. No dedicated side form exists. Current routing updated for chat. placement-inventory-current.json." } }, { "id": "m02", "requirement": "M02 · A general enquiry from the collection hero appears in QlickCRM → Ajánlatkérések with its actual submission-page URL in “Forrásoldal URL-je” and exactly “hero-form” in “Űrlap helye”.", "verification": "Submit from the live hero, reopen the CRM card and compare the visible fields with website state and provider readback.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md", "note": "PARTIAL: reopened native 1921 shows exact hero-form, actual tagged collection source and general-request data from the controlled HTTP fixture. A protected live hero browser completion remains unproved." } }, { "id": "m03", "requirement": "M03 · Every tested real side/bottom form shows its own page and exact placement. A campaign-tagged submission preserves the complete URL, including normal query separators, as readable, copyable and usable data on the reopened CRM card. Implement an automatic workaround if the current writer corrupts it.", "verification": "Test an existing placement with ?utm_source=lllqa&utm_campaign=crm-forras plus an encoded query-value fixture. Compare captured URL, saved source, reopened field, copied value and link target. Verify all query keys/values survive. Distinguish harmless API/HTML serialization from literal corruption in the visible or copied URL. A shortened URL, lost query, manual per-lead edit or broken %26 separator is not a pass.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "note": "PASS: native reopened 1943 automatic description anchor copied and followed to the byte-exact full URL, including encoded query values. Field 49 still shows literal &, so the supported description anchor is the implemented workaround. Existing bottom-form placement is retained. crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md and crm-acceptance-recovery/index.md.", "reference": "evidence/crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md" } }, { "id": "m04", "requirement": "M04 · Submissions from different pages or placements keep their own URL and form label, even when they share a technical form. A later submission never overwrites an earlier request’s source.", "verification": "Use two actual locations of a shared form, or two different forms if none is shared. Reopen both records. The coverage matrix contains a successful website-origin source-mapping result for every active placement.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/api-matrix-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: different controlled HTTP fixtures preserve their independent source/placement values. The inventory covers every actual placement. Successful browser-origin source-mapping results for every one of 23 placements have not been completed." } } ], "constraints": [ { "id": "url-workaround", "text": "Choose the simplest maintainable automatic route: a suitable supported CRM field/rendering, alternate write route, or server-side transformation/persistence. These are candidates, not proven fixes. Test reversibility and future requests. Do not turn temporary browser credentials or per-lead manual edits into production dependencies.", "source": "Matt response annotation 2, existing source-URL request, parent implementation guidance." }, { "id": "url-contract-meaning", "text": "Preserve the actual page at submission time, not the first visit, canonical URL, REST endpoint or thank-you page. Do not fabricate missing historical sources. Correct semantic storage/display matters. Harmless transport escaping is acceptable only when the opened/copied/clicked URL and decoded provider values match exactly.", "source": "Matt earlier source-URL instruction and current workaround request. This relaxes the parent’s earlier demand that every raw API representation use identical bytes." } ] }, { "id": "d4", "name": "D4 · Show the correct enquiry type and travel period", "bullet": "Distinguish general interest from a selected trip and show the traveller’s actual dates.", "current_problem": "The client cannot reliably identify the intended trip and period in incoming leads.", "proposed_change": "Give general, specific-group, individual, wedding/honeymoon and company enquiries truthful titles and separate period/night fields. Preserve years, flexible dates and ranges as entered.", "visible_at": "QlickCRM request titles and labelled fields, plus received notifications.", "representative_test": "Compare a general July request with a selected-trip request and year-only/flexible examples.", "criteria": [ { "id": "m05", "requirement": "M05 · A hero enquiry with “2027. július közepe”, 9-10 nights and 2 passengers shows “Általános érdeklődés”, “Kiválasztott út: Nincs kiválasztva”, and those separate period/night/passenger values. Its title and received notification identify a general enquiry, not an invented specific trip. The separate 14+ case retains 14+.", "verification": "Compare filled website, reopened CRM card, provider values and delivered QA notification. Keep period and nights separate.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/api-matrix-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: 1921/1922 retain general enquiry, no selected trip, July mid-period, separate 9-10/14+ and two passengers, with received notifications. Actual protected filled-website submission remains unproved." } }, { "id": "m06", "requirement": "M06 · A trip-specific enquiry shows the actual selected or clearly indicated trip name and approved departure date/range. It is labelled “Konkrét csoportos út”. General chat does not become trip-specific just because it appears on a trip page.", "verification": "Submit from a real trip page. Compare the approved trip source, visible form, CRM and notification. If there is no exact approved date, show the verified text or “Nincs megadva”, never invent a date.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/api-matrix-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: controlled trip fixture 1931 and general-chat fixture1936 preserve their distinct types and notifications. Approved trip source is retained. Normal protected trip-page browser submission remains unproved." } }, { "id": "m07", "requirement": "M07 · A year-only or flexible-period enquiry keeps exactly that meaning in the form and CRM. Staff can see the entered text even when a technical date field is empty. No invented day or 1970 date is presented as the requested travel date.", "verification": "Submit year-only and flexible cases. Check the opened card and raw values separately from any formatted API defaults.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "note": "PASS: native 1943/1944/1945 keep year 2027, native 1940 retains flexible 2027 with technical date field empty. No invented day or 1970 displayed. crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md.", "reference": "evidence/crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md" } }, { "id": "m08", "requirement": "M08 · Individual, wedding/honeymoon and company requests each show their correct enquiry type and supplied period in the CRM card and delivered notification. An individual request is not headed “Csoportos Ajánlatkérés”.", "verification": "Submit distinct website examples for all three form types and compare type, period and collected fields across website, CRM and QA inbox.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/api-matrix-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: individual1924, wedding/honeymoon1925 and company1926 controlled CF7 fixtures retain correct distinct types/periods and received notifications. Desktop/mobile normal protected website completion remains unproved." } } ] }, { "id": "d5", "name": "D5 · Make every lead readable and link its partner", "bullet": "Let staff read every supplied answer directly on the CRM card.", "current_problem": "Fields exist, but their complete real-submission presentation and partner behavior are not yet accepted.", "proposed_change": "Show all provided contact and travel details in labelled CRM fields, preserve full messages, distinguish missing values and retain separate requests under the correct partner.", "visible_at": "QlickCRM → Ajánlatkérések list/card and Partnerek.", "representative_test": "Open a new and a repeat partner’s requests and compare every submitted field without searching an email body.", "criteria": [ { "id": "m09", "requirement": "M09 · The Ajánlatkérések list has a readable title. On the opened card staff can read separately labelled source URL, placement, type, period, nights, traveller type, passenger count, budget with its Ft/fő unit, accommodation, experiences and full message. They do not need to search inside an HTML email.", "verification": "Submit distinct valid values the form actually supports, then compare each on the opened card and provider readback. Use a native supported field/description arrangement if needed. Technical IDs remain searchable without dominating the title.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "note": "PASS: reopened native 1921 displays separately labelled source, hero-form, type, July mid-period, 9-10 nights, traveller type, 2 passengers, 1 200 000 Ft/fő, accommodation, experiences and full message. Title type precedes searchable UUID. crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md.", "reference": "evidence/crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md" } }, { "id": "m10", "requirement": "M10 · Unasked or unanswered fields are empty or clearly “Nem megadott” / “Nem kért”. Other submitted values remain intact. No fabricated zero, unrelated test value or false date appears as a client preference.", "verification": "Use a form that does not ask budget or nights. Compare the opened card and raw data. Empty versus null on unused fields is not itself a business defect.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "note": "PASS: reopened native 1943 unasked fields display Nem kért and passenger count Nincs megadva, with no fabricated zero. Supplied year and source remain intact. crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md.", "reference": "evidence/crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md" } }, { "id": "m11", "requirement": "M11 · A new requester becomes a partner with the supplied name, email and phone. A later request links to the same appropriate partner while both requests retain their own trip data. Empty values do not erase useful existing partner details.", "verification": "Submit first and subsequent requests with changed travel details. Compare partner fields, request links and the independently retained request values in CRM and provider readback.", "checked": true, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/followup-api-reconciliation.json", "note": "PASS: actual controlled website-endpoint first/subsequent changed and identical requests retain appropriate partner3716 and independent1932/1933/1934 request data, supplied identity/phone and useful existing details. Empty values do not erase existing useful fields. This accepts the partner-link/preservation outcome. Normal protected browser-path acceptance remains independently open underM15." } } ] }, { "id": "d6", "name": "D6 · Deliver one notification per real submission", "bullet": "Test notification delivery through an inbox we can read, then restore the production recipient.", "current_problem": "The earlier executor treated access to the production mailbox as a blocker. Duplicate versus legitimate new submission behavior still needs decisive proof.", "proposed_change": "Use an accessible inbox for labelled QA notifications. Prove single-send, double-click/retry and deliberate-new-submission behavior. Restore the production route and record exactly what was tested.", "visible_at": "Actual received QA inbox messages, QlickCRM request count and partner links, final recipient configuration.", "representative_test": "Receive one complete message for one request, one for a retry, and two for two deliberately new requests.", "criteria": [ { "id": "m12", "requirement": "M12 · One logical website submission creates one actionable CRM request and one complete notification in an accessible test inbox. Related email processing does not create a second actionable enquiry. Production notification routing is restored after testing.", "verification": "Use a labelled QA address/submission ID, inspect the received email including headers and count CRM records after processing settles. Temporarily reroute only synthetic QA notifications to a confirmed readable inbox. Trace any CRM email-import branch so a changed recipient does not silently bypass the suspected duplicate path. Record the restored production recipient/configuration. Direct access to the production inbox is not a prerequisite under Matt’s new instruction.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "note": "PARTIAL: one complete received notification, current UUID count one (1940), matching active importer exclusion and restored routing pass. Actual cPanel Exim trace correlates exact UUID/Message-ID and proves Bcc recipient accepted by MailChannels. Monitored-folder receipt and settled importer lifecycle remain unproved. Per-message discard log is one possible proof, not a mandatory format. importer-acceptance-review.md and crm-acceptance-recovery-report.md. Bounded recovery exhausted recorded mailbox and native source routes." } }, { "id": "m13", "requirement": "M13 · Double-clicks, network retry and background retry of the same logical submission each leave one CRM request and one complete received notification. A recoverable delivery failure is retried without losing the request.", "verification": "Test the three cases separately with actual website events and controlled fault/retry where needed. Include double-clicks that would otherwise create different UUIDs. Count at the documented completed processing/retry state, not an arbitrary early moment.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/fault-api-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: actual controlled mail failure recovery, CRM retry and concurrent same-UUID delivery each settle with one CRM request and one received notification. A real browser double-click that might generate different UUIDs and its completed trace remain unproved." } }, { "id": "m14", "requirement": "M14 · Two deliberately new submissions from the same person create two requests and two notifications linked to one partner. This also holds when the two new submissions contain identical answers.", "verification": "Start fresh submission events twice, first with different travel details and then with identical content. Compare separate submission IDs, CRM cards, partner links and received QA messages. Do not deduplicate by email or content alone.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/followup-api-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: deliberately fresh identical-content UUIDs produce separate1932/1933, one notification each and one linked partner3716. Changed-content1934 retained separately. Fresh browser event generation/reset has not been proved by accepted protected visitor submissions." } } ], "constraints": [ { "id": "qa-routing", "text": "Before testing, confirm read access to the chosen inbox. Back up To/Cc/Bcc, forwarding/import behavior and affected mail settings. Prefer a narrowly scoped override for clearly identified synthetic QA submissions, leaving real enquiries on the original route. Restore and read back all temporary routing afterward.", "source": "Matt response annotation 1. QA-only scoping and restoration are reversible implementation safeguards." }, { "id": "mail-proof-limit", "text": "Actually received messages prove delivery to the test inbox. Final production routing is proven by configuration readback. Do not claim direct receipt in foglalas@analit.hu when that inbox was not read. Trace equivalent email-import processing so the QA route does not conceal duplicate creation.", "source": "Matt authorizes an accessible test recipient. Truthful evidence boundary, not a requirement to recover production inbox credentials." } ] }, { "id": "d7", "name": "D7 · Complete testing and hand over an honest result", "bullet": "Complete CAPTCHA testing, including restoration checks if it is temporarily disabled.", "current_problem": "The prior run stopped at 8/32 verified checks. This is a verification count, not a percentage of code completed.", "proposed_change": "Use the authorized CAPTCHA routes and complete independent outcomes. Finish newsletter consent, historic recovery, regression tests and a concise unsent client reply. Deliver proof of the actual working system.", "visible_at": "Live site, CRM, QA inbox, this board and executor-handoff.md.", "representative_test": "Restore CAPTCHA, demonstrate valid acceptance and invalid-token rejection, then reconcile all seven deliverables.", "criteria": [ { "id": "m15", "requirement": "M15 · The live website-to-CRM-to-notification path works for every actual form placement, with correct source, type, period, supplied values and partner link. Both desktop and mobile form behavior are verified. After any CAPTCHA exception is removed, successful protected visitor submissions prove each distinct processing path still works.", "verification": "Use the existing placement matrix and minimum distinct fixtures that cover its branches. Each placement gets a website-origin submission result. Exercise each form family on desktop and mobile. Controlled CAPTCHA-off runs may prove mapping and delivery, clearly labelled. Then prove normal protected success for each distinct submission pipeline, including quote and newsletter, plus chat if separately handled. Direct CRM inserts do not replace website-origin tests. Do not repeat identical full tests solely to increase a count.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/api-matrix-reconciliation.json", "note": "PARTIAL: controlled CF7 fixtures cover distinct form families and mapping/delivery, plus browser newsletter new/repeat successes under an exact-alias exception. Those are labelled exception-window tests. Normal restored protected quote/newsletter/chat positives and accepted submission results for every placement remain unproved." } }, { "id": "m16", "requirement": "M16 · A website newsletter sign-up appears once in QlickCRM Marketing → “Balionline weboldal feliratkozók”. Repeat sign-up does not duplicate it. A quote-form newsletter checkbox follows the person’s choice. Leaving it empty does not create a subscription or remove a pre-existing one.", "verification": "Test new and existing subscriber addresses, quote opt-in checked and unchecked, and an existing subscriber submitting an unchecked quote. Compare website response, list membership and provider readback. Include restored protected newsletter success. Send no newsletter campaign.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/native-consent-runtime-verification-report.md", "note": "PARTIAL: controlled new/repeat/sole-address checked/unchecked and source-level selected-only cases passed. Both PHP sources deployed; daemon installed but now stopped/unregistered for client authentication mitigation, but actual installed runtime failed on SQL collation1267 and HTML email-obfuscated queue reads. Diagnostic queue choices/identity survive restart and QA fields/restoration pass. Successful automatic activation/list append is UNPROVED. Transport/authentication correction is active; existing permitted cPanel PHP/WordPress runtime is proved. No repeat test challenge. Client-specific triple/QAcleanup investigations remain separate. Restored normal protected newsletter success remains open. No campaign or confirmation-email flow." } }, { "id": "m17", "requirement": "M17 · After tests, every temporary CAPTCHA exception is removed and the original protection is active. Missing and invalid tokens are rejected for quote and newsletter routes with no CRM record, subscription or notification created.", "verification": "Compare restored files/configuration with exact backups, run both negative cases against the server, and correlate CRM/inbox counts. Pair with protected positive tests in M15/M16. Never label an exception-window success as normal protected success.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/negative-newsletter-browser-receipt.json", "note": "PARTIAL: all temporary CAPTCHA exceptions removed; missing/invalid quote and newsletter negatives reject with zero matching CRM/subscription/received QA notification. Original keys/server verifier/static CF7 protection remain unchanged by the intentional two-line dynamic-host runtime repair, final SHA f7f116. Exact preimage ac7ee retained. Required normal protected positive pair still open; exception-window successes are not claimed normal." } }, { "id": "m18", "requirement": "M18 · The final board and concise handoff distinguish completed, failed and untested outcomes, with usable evidence. Recover proven missing data on the identified historic enquiries. Keep unavailable values “Nincs megadva” with a precise loss list. Preserve flight cards, trip order, budget/night controls and the April 5–19 itinerary image fix. Provide an unsent client reply and exact restoration instructions.", "verification": "Reconcile all criteria, fixture IDs and evidence. Check only the identified historic records against recoverable originals with rollback. Recheck the named regressions and existing success-measurement event. Include production notification routing restored, CAPTCHA restored, and cookie/measurement gating intentionally still off until Matt requests re-enable. No client message is sent.", "checked": false, "evidence": { "state": "observed", "reference": "evidence/historic-recovery-loss-list.md", "note": "PARTIAL: exact 1809 eight-field recovery retained; 1800/1801/1808 current detail GET404 is recorded without deletion/reconstruction claims. Flight values/trip order/budget-night controls/April image fixes retained. Client reply UNSENT and restore instructions provided. Final QA reconciliation and genuine success-measurement event remain open." } } ], "constraints": [ { "id": "captcha-recovery", "text": "Try normal browser CAPTCHA completion first. If it cannot be completed, use the authorized narrow, time-bounded disablement, with exact backup and automatic cleanup/finally restoration. Complete website-origin mapping and notification tests, then restore and verify positive protected behavior and server rejection. Runtime-mandated confirmations apply only to the particular gated action.", "source": "Matt response annotation 3 and earlier explicit temporary-disable/test/restore instruction. No repeat permission request for already-authorized CAPTCHA work." }, { "id": "proof-scope", "text": "Reuse valid evidence for unchanged work. Every placement must prove its website-origin values. Desktop/mobile checks follow distinct form logic. Controlled exception tests and restored normal-path tests stay separately labelled. One decisive fixture may satisfy several criteria. Do not add compulsory screenshot quotas or blanket repeat submissions that prove nothing new.", "source": "Matt: do not overcomplicate, verify what matters and do not let optional checks block. Revises parent-imposed duplicate testing and blind-image-review quotas without dropping observable outcomes." } ] } ], "questions": [], "comments_read_at": "2026-09-30T21:38:19.639652+00:00. Previous board: zero stored comments/rewrites returned. All three latest response annotations incorporated.", "output_path": "/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/Analit/outputs/analit-completion-ll2-20260930", "report_path": "/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/Analit/outputs/analit-completion-ll2-20260930/executor-handoff.md", "constraints": [ { "id": "prepare-launch", "text": "This is a fresh-run contract prepared under LL2. No executor is created or queued during preparation. A later explicit Launch starts one fresh Sol Medium executor unless Matt specifies a model. The previous blocked executor and paused checkpoint automation remain inactive.", "source": "Current LL2 request and its Prepare → review → Launch flow." }, { "id": "ownership", "text": "At Launch, verify the old executor remains terminal and transfer production-write ownership once. The new executor owns this run and the necessary website/CRM/mail changes. Treat the prior run as evidence, not a concurrent work queue. Never overwrite unrelated edits.", "source": "Matt requests a new executor. Prior ccc-state.json records the old executor as blocked." }, { "id": "site-edit-route", "text": "Use look-for-access and the working code/provider route for WordPress edits. Browser use is allowed where needed for actual visitor behavior, CRM display, CAPTCHA and visual evidence. No new security layer. Preserve prices, trip content and unrelated campaigns.", "source": "Matt’s API-first clarification and AGENTS.md." }, { "id": "send-budget", "text": "Label synthetic tests clearly. Internal QA notifications to the controlled accessible inbox are authorized. No client/lead WhatsApp, email, marketing campaign or vendor-support message is authorized by this contract. The client reply stays a draft. External spend in this continuation is capped at the remaining amount of the stricter USD 15 aggregate limit unless an explicit higher allowance is confirmed.", "source": "Matt’s QA instruction, existing draft-only scope, latest AGENTS.md and developer external-send rule." }, { "id": "preserve-cookie-choice", "text": "Cookie UI and all measurement-consent gates stay off until Matt asks to re-enable them. This is separate from temporary CAPTCHA disablement, which must be restored. Keep form privacy and newsletter choices meaningful.", "source": "Matt’s direct cookie annotation and existing U10." }, { "id": "finish-and-return", "text": "Execute recovery independently, apply am-i-blocked before claiming a blocker, and finish independent outcomes. Return DONE only with decisive proof. Otherwise return STALLED with exact irreducible limitation and resume point. No polling, transcript supervision, routine child wrap-up or duplicate completion messages.", "source": "Matt’s current delegation and persistence instructions." }, { "id": "out-of-scope", "text": "Facebook repair and new individual-travel/advisory content awaiting client materials remain outside this completion run. Historical recovery covers identified affected leads only. Do not recreate missing QA cards or invent unavailable data.", "source": "Earlier direct scope and current inherited seven-deliverable contract." }, { "id": "public-evidence", "text": "Publish the board under its stable bare URL without secrets or customer personal data. Retain originals privately. Do not automatically open files, previews or tabs. Close temporary browser tabs when finished unless Matt needs to act there.", "source": "Matt’s latest AGENTS.md." } ], "resources": [ { "id": "prior-run", "text": "/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/Analit/outputs/analit-unified-lll-20260929 contains the frozen prior contract, concise handoff, 23-placement test matrix, evidence and provider recovery paths. Read only relevant completed artifacts, not the old chat transcript." }, { "id": "prior-board", "text": "Prior result and evidence: https://review.clientsflow.hu/analit-unified-site-crm-2026-09-29-v1/ . Eight previously verified IDs: U01, U02, U03, U04, U07, U08, U12, M01. Do not treat new unchecked boxes as evidence that these were undone." }, { "id": "site-reference", "text": "Collection https://balionline.hu/csoportos-utak-gyujtooldal/ and trip https://balionline.hu/utazas/bali-10-ejszakas-csoportos-utazas/ . Approved copy/layout reference: /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/Analit/outputs/analit-unified-lll-20260929/meeting-hero-reference.html" }, { "id": "crm-recovery", "text": "Prior continuation-20260930/r4-recovery-findings.md and URL probe receipts establish failed v2, JSON Unicode and official CF7 module/modulepartner routes. Existing native session access worked, but no maintainable automatic writer was established. Change strategy rather than repeat unchanged probes." }, { "id": "provider-path", "text": "Existing WordPress route: WPCode 526 plus cache option 222, CF7 1253 _form/_mail, existing MU plugins. Provider helper: /Users/agency/.local/share/analit-recovery/bali-20260907/access.py . Verify fresh state before changing it and never expose credentials." } ], "tools": [ { "id": "entry-skills", "text": "Use launch-agent at actual launch and before any nested delegation, look-for-access for private services, am-i-blocked for recovery, luna-visual-qa-section-screehoshots for client-page deployments, and comment-html-review-host for this board." }, { "id": "single-return", "text": "Report to parent local thread 01a0db3c-f175-7130-af9a-ab2545407076 through one native DONE/STALLED final return, with the assigned executor-handoff.md path. Template: /Users/agency/.agents/skills/launch-agent/report-template.md." } ], "model": "gpt-6.1-sol", "reasoning_effort": "high" }