# Final mobile section comparison

The completed independent mobile audit covers 150 actual postdeployment 390×844 screenshots on both copies. No confirmed visual defects remain. CSS and JavaScript hashes match the deployed e3433f9 version before and after review. Actual menu navigation, six contact entrypoints, all three tabs, close/reopen, background menu access, internal touch scrolling, distinct calendars, table columns and both PDF pages were inspected.

The coordinator launch receipt identifies gpt-6-luna with max effort and a fresh context. The child could not see its own launch metadata and therefore called the reviewer route unverified. That statement is reconciled against the explicit launcher receipt, not interpreted as a different reviewer. Max is the documented substitute for unavailable xhigh in that coordinator runtime. The original report is preserved unchanged.

At390px the expanded PDF already fills the available width, so the wider-preview toggle cannot make it wider. The desktop audit and root382px mobile measurement show expected layout. This is not a hidden failed width check. Physical-device behavior was not tested. Mobile review was read-only. Save/export behavior is proven separately by the deployed functional receipts.