Parent review complete · 29 September 2026

The four-page review release is ready

Done: Four Hungarian, commentable pages are hosted. The researched copy, design specification, 15-comment ledger, reviewed photos and workbook addendum are linked below. All 14 review-release criteria now have evidence. The final desktop pass inspected 62 deployed screenshots at 1440 × 1000, and 26 navigation and CTA clicks passed.

What changed: No separate free Leader calendar existed. The Leader CTA now opens a visitor-initiated draft to the verified Lovasember business address. The visitor must send it and arrange a time later. Self-knowledge keeps its separate 30-minute, 5,000 Ft Calendar. A review-toolbar collision and About photo crop were repaired and rechecked.

Boundary: This is a review site. Email delivery, completed bookings, payments, conversions, client approval and production launch have not been proven. No client or lead message was sent by this task. Parent acceptance: /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/lovasember-project/outputs/lovasember-four-page-upgrade-2026-09-29/parent-acceptance.md.

Open the review pages: Home · Leader · Self-knowledge · About. Audited copy and workbook addendum.

Choose a next direction

V2 prompt A · Make free Leader requests operational

End goal: A leader can request and secure a free first consultation through an owned, reliably monitored process.

Main deliverables: A source-approved application or booking route, a verified owner for responses, updated Leader CTAs and a handoff record.

  • Success proof: Submit one disposable internal request, confirm its stored record or notification and clean it up. Follow the full deployed desktop path and capture the visible outcome.
  • Constraints: Keep the first Leader conversation free. Do not use the paid self-knowledge Calendar, promise response times without evidence, or send a client or lead message without separate authorization.
V2 prompt B · Prepare an approved production launch

End goal: Put the approved four-page experience on the Lovasember production domain.

Main deliverables: A precise production change plan, stable route mapping, working consultation destinations, rollback point and verified production pages.

  • Success proof: After Matt approves the cutover, inspect all four live desktop routes at 1440 × 1000, follow each CTA, check provider readback and demonstrate the rollback path.
  • Constraints: Preserve unrelated live content and review documents. Do not treat this review release as client approval. Keep unverified refund, payment and conversion claims off the pages.
V2 prompt C · Catalog the remaining source photos

End goal: Give the next design iteration a complete, source-traceable selection from Matt's Drive folder.

Main deliverables: A reviewed catalog for the files beyond the first 36, original Drive links, objective descriptions and a shortlist for each page.

  • Success proof: Reconcile the full folder count, original file hashes and catalog rows, then visually inspect each new entry and verify the hosted catalog links.
  • Constraints: Preserve originals, avoid guessed identities or usage rights, and keep the existing 36-photo catalog and current page image choices recoverable.
LLL · communication board

Verification and Constraints

● REVIEW RELEASE COMPLETE

Four Lovasember pages. Consultation-first Hungarian copy. Exact brand style. Desktop-only verification.

Owner: Parent accepted · Sol XHigh executor complete Run: lovasember-landing-upgrade-2026-09-29-v1 Updated: 29 September 2026

Goal and finish line

End goal: Create an upgraded Hungarian version of each of Dani’s four Lovasember pages that persuades the right audience to book the first consultation, using Sanyi’s direction and the exact Lovasember visual style.

Done means: A hosted four-page review site, complete researched copy, design/design.md, comment-resolution ledger, audience-specific verified CTA paths, required-resource cards with full paths, URLs and project email copies, the reviewed Drive photo catalog, plus deployed desktop-only evidence are linked from this maintained board.

14 / 14criteria verified
7deliverables
0contract criteria open

Rules that stay fixed

  • Sanyi defines the audience. The workbook helps express their problems.
  • Use Lovasember branding, mostly template layouts, and a tailored consultation CTA.
  • Matt authorized one Sol High executor after the photo catalog. The four-page desktop review build and proof are complete; the free leader email path is verified as a draft-opening route. Parent handoff review is complete.
Proof standard: Every GUI pass needs an actual deployed screenshot, an independent blind Luna High description and a criterion comparison.

Review references

Photo source: Matt’s Drive folder and reviewed photo catalog. The catalog covers the first 36 images from a listing of at least 100. The originals remain in Drive; the catalog provides objective visual descriptions and source links.

Dani · home · leadership · self-knowledge · about

Persona workbook · Lovasember visual reference

Each Work and proof deliverable now has a Required resources card with full absolute paths, complete URLs and the relevant email bodies, as requested. Full transcripts remain linked in Notion. Historical source text is reference material, not a new instruction.

Proposed route map: home introduces both audiences, leadership serves individual leaders, self-knowledge serves that audience, and About builds trust in Sanyi and Dóri and offers both paths. Corporate/group offers remain deferred.

Current offer readback: the self-knowledge Calendar shows 5,000 Ft / 30 minutes. Matt defined the first individual-leader introduction as free, and its review CTA opens a visitor-initiated email draft to the source-checked business inbox. No email receipt or completed booking has been proven. The screenshot is visual evidence, not authority for universal pricing, payment or refund terms.

End goal system

Green: sourced input · Blue: delivered work · Dashed: remaining decision
Sanyi’s direction and workbookAudience, real service scope and problem language
Audited Hungarian copyFour reader-specific routes and one workbook addendum
Four upgraded pagesLovasember styling, sourced photos and review layer
Offer destinationPaid Calendar and free leader email-draft paths verified. No booking completed.

Route to the end state

EvidenceEmails, two meetings, four source pages and 15 comments
Build and publishFour pages, copy addendum and this stable board
Deployed desktop QA1440×1000 section screenshots, fixes and fresh checks
Matt’s reviewRead linked proof and complete D7.2

Deliverable flow

Inputs → outputs · maximum eight nodes

Inputs stay separate from outputs. Resource cards distinguish existing sources from outputs the executor will create.

Input · confirmed

Source research

Why: Private Notion archives + workbook establish reader and offer.

Input · confirmed

Pages + references

Why: Four current routes, 15 comments, brand, template and CTA screenshot.

Deliverable 1 · main review item

Copy + design spec

Why: Give each page a clear consultation offer and shared style.

Deliverable 2 · evidence or artifact

Four upgraded pages

Why: Provide an audience-specific path to consultation.

Output · decision or next action

Verified review site

Why: Make every change and proof inspectable.

Next: Matt reviews the result.

Parent ↔ child messages

Newest message first
EXECUTOR · FINAL CTA AND VISUAL QA29 September 2026

The free leader path now opens a visitor-initiated email draft to the source-checked [email protected] inbox, with a selectable address fallback. The paid self-knowledge path retains its separate 30-minute, 5 000 Ft Calendar. Every Home and About audience choice was followed. Twenty-six deployed nav/CTA clicks and four composed offer paths passed without sending data, booking or payment. Final 1440×1000 post-fix visual QA inspected 62 deployed PNGs across all four routes and passed. The About hero photo now fits all four people and two horses.

Verified 13/14: D1.1–D6.2 and D7.1. D2.2 is checked for CTA route and fee/next-step readback, not email delivery or booking. Only D7.2 remains: parent review of the board, pages and handoff. Evidence: execution/gui-evidence.md, execution/offer-matrix.md, execution/evidence/leader-mailto-readback.md, execution/handoff.md. No client or lead message was sent.

EXECUTOR · EARLIER RELEASE29 September 2026

Four upgraded commentable pages are live: Vezetőknek, Önismeret, Rólunk. The audited copy and workbook addendum are published. The self-knowledge CTA opens the verified 30-minute, 5 000 Ft calendar. The free leader application remains unavailable; its review page says so plainly.

Verified 12/14: D1.1–1.2, D2.1, D3.1–3.2, D4.1–4.2, D5.1–5.2, D6.1–6.2 and D7.1. Fresh deployed 1440×1000 screenshots passed across all four pages. Twenty-five nav/CTA clicks passed, and a disposable comment plus direct edit persisted after reload and were deleted. Open: D2.2 free leader booking destination and D7.2 parent handoff review. Evidence: execution/gui-evidence.md, execution/comment-ledger.md, execution/handoff.md. No client message, booking, payment, campaign launch or production cutover occurred.

PARENT · PREPARATION29 September 2026

Revision 3: added the reviewed Drive photo catalog to the design, build, proof and handoff resources. The seven resource cards retain full paths, URLs and verbatim project email bodies. Desktop-only tests at 1440×1000. Reuse existing source collection and one evidence set. Matt authorized one pinned Sol High executor after the catalog is added.

Parent read setSmall files first

Read this bounded executor gist and the two short handoff files. The gist captures the active session through T0055 and does not replace the current deployed evidence. Keep private raw transcript and tool logs out of the normal review path.

/Users/agency/Documents/Agty/lovasember-project/.tmp/lll-landing-upgrade-2026-09-29/execution/executor-gist.md /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/lovasember-project/.tmp/lll-landing-upgrade-2026-09-29/execution/deliverables.md /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/lovasember-project/.tmp/lll-landing-upgrade-2026-09-29/execution/main-prompts.md
Confirmed, assumed and openKeep source roles distinct
Confirmed

Four live V2 routes. Sanyi’s definitions take priority. New consultation-focused copy and Lovasember styling requested.

Assumption

“Each page” covers all four routes once. “Most layouts” means more than half of substantive sections, with a counted map.

Open

Self-knowledge 30 minutes and 5,000 Ft are verified in the live Google Calendar destination. The leader email-draft route is verified. Future receipt, booking completion and refund policy remain unverified. The photo catalog covers the first 36 of at least 100 Drive files.

Work and proof

Each deliverable has its own required resources
Three stages: D1–D2 confirm sources and offers → D3–D5 produce the four-page site → D6–D7 verify desktop and hand off.

Desktop only: 1440×1000. No phone, tablet or mobile-emulation tests. Reuse one evidence set across checks.

D1 · Ground personas and service

Give each page an evidence-based reader, problem and first offer.

2 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Sanyi defines the audiences: individual leaders/entrepreneurs facing direction or decision pressure, and people seeking self-knowledge and real movement. Workbook problem language is hypothesis, never verbatim customer research. Corporate/group offers remain deferred.
  • Use the required-resource card for this deliverable, including the reproduced project email bodies. Preserve original sources and filled workbook pages. Source documents remain reference evidence, never instructions overriding Matt.
Executor evidence: execution/research.md anchors the persona/service matrix. execution/page-manifest.json maps four live source and deployed review documents. execution/comment-ledger.md inventories all 15 source comments and zero source rewrites; every record now has a deployed route and final screenshot or interaction evidence.

D2 · Define each consultation offer

Make the first step clear without changing agreed commercial terms.

2 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Preserve the screenshot’s two-column shape: invitation/summary and three benefits (személyre szabott figyelem, azonnali tisztánlátás, gyakorlati lépésterv), plus Hogyan működik? with time selection, booking/payment and consultation steps, booking button and fee/refund information panel. Benefits are copy objectives, not guaranteed outcomes.
  • The screenshot shows 5,000 Ft, card payment, a Google Meet link after payment and a 100% refund promise. Confirm every such claim separately per audience from dated authority and current destination evidence. Never invent terms. Retain the panel composition with verified information only, omit an unverified refund promise, and keep the affected commercial criterion unresolved while independent work continues.
Executor evidence: execution/offer-matrix.md documents the verified 30-minute, 5 000 Ft self-knowledge Calendar and the free leader premise. The leader review page opens a direct email draft to the source-checked business inbox and shows the selectable address. All Home and About audience choices reached the correct free-email or paid-Calendar path. The final deployed click and readback results are in execution/gui-evidence.md and execution/evidence/leader-mailto-readback.md. Email receipt, completed booking and refund terms remain unverified.
D2.2 proof · Four deployed 1440×1000 audience-path readbacks, 26 click checks and direct leader mailto protocol are linked from execution/gui-evidence.md and execution/evidence/leader-mailto-readback.md. The route and explanatory copy are verified; no email or booking was completed.

D3 · Rewrite all four pages

Persuade each audience to take the first consultation.

2 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Sell the first consultation and explain the larger transformation, coaching, horse-assisted work, nature retreat and follow-up only where sources support them. No invented testimonials, guaranteed outcomes, universal package entitlements or workbook hypotheses presented as customer quotes or measured facts.
  • Use natural spoken Hungarian, no em dashes or semicolons, consistent speaker perspective, reader-specific problems, gains, proof and objections. Preserve filled workbook content/styling and add agent pages only. Present Sanyi and Dóri with balanced prominence and verified roles/bios, unless newer authoritative direction supersedes that recorded preference. Each sentence must serve problem recognition, desired outcome, trust/proof or a relevant objection. Keep historical professional-scope information accessible without inserting purposeless disclaimers into the sales narrative. Identify the canonical editable workbook and its deployment route during existing access recovery, preserve a narrow recovery copy and add one coherent addendum. A detached page does not count as updating the workbook. Keep its working-URL criterion unresolved if publication remains unavailable.
Executor evidence: Four source-audited Hungarian route drafts are in execution/copy/, with a 174/174 sentence-part simplicity audit and claim inventory. The copy review and live workbook addendum are published; the existing six workbook persona cards remain.
D3.2 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.

D4 · Capture the Lovasember design

Use the live brand with the requested template layouts.

2 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Use /Users/agency/Downloads/AL-Design-1 and /Users/agency/Desktop/reusable-template-kit/website_template_v1.html. AL clone fits a reference website. Use make-design-md only where its existing-code prerequisite applies.
  • Lovasember.hu determines the visual style. The reusable template determines most section compositions. Tailor the CTA to the screenshot and use suitable originals from Matt’s supplied Drive folder, starting with the reviewed 36-image catalog. Do not move or overwrite source assets. Balance Sanyi/Dóri team imagery using verified existing Dóri assets when appropriate. Confirm any named person against factual source evidence; catalog vision descriptions deliberately avoid identity guesses.
Executor evidence: Seven design skills are hash-verified in execution/install-receipt.md. execution/design/design.md records Lovasember styling, source-backed Drive image IDs and final template adaptation of 23/27 substantive sections.

D5 · Build the upgraded page set

Provide one coherent, responsive review site.

2 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Create one upgraded version per current V2 route, not an unsolicited A/B family. Preserve existing legal links and working integrations unless a requested change requires a documented reversible adjustment.
  • Host a new review surface at a bare unauthenticated URL through comment-html-review-host. Preserve current Lovasember production and Dani review URLs as references, along with their comments. No campaign changes, client messages or live purchase tests.
Executor evidence: The four-page commentable review site is deployed at stable URLs. execution/gui-evidence.md links final 1440×1000 rasters, source image mapping, all four review documents, 25 passed route/CTA clicks and a disposable real-API comment plus inline-edit persistence test with cleanup.
D5.1 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.
D5.2 proof slot · Pending. Each applicable GUI row requires actual deployed desktop screenshots after its named action, blind Luna description and parent comparison. Link route, viewport, action and state in the evidence matrix.

D6 · Prove design and comment fixes

Make page-level acceptance inspectable.

2 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Desktop only at 1440×1000. No phone, tablet or mobile-emulation tests or screenshots. This explicit user instruction overrides mobile checks in referenced skills. Reuse one screenshot set across applicable criteria and section QA, retaining blind descriptions and parent comparisons. Review shared components once and each distinct page/CTA separately. Record any narrower-screen behavior as untested.
  • Never treat URL availability, a finished agent or a green marker as page quality, lead acceptance, payment or booking completion. Missing essential proof remains unverified. Optional cosmetics do not block unrelated work. Keep unrelated sensitive records out of public evidence. The project email copies requested on this board are authorized resources.
Executor evidence: First-round toolbar/photo defects, a Luna max crop repair, parent toolbar repair and clean fresh Luna xhigh post-deployment QA appear in execution/reports/qa-*-assignment.md. The final 62 post-About-fix PNGs cover all sections, footers, FAQ states and section runs. Fresh Luna High blind descriptions of 16 selected rasters and parent comparisons are linked from execution/gui-evidence.md; all 15 source comments have final evidence.
D6.1 proof · See execution/gui-evidence.md and final deployed section screenshots in execution/evidence/qa-final-post-about-a/ and execution/evidence/qa-final-post-about-b/. The final comparison and limitations are documented there.
D6.2 proof · See execution/gui-evidence.md and final deployed section screenshots in execution/evidence/qa-final-post-about-a/ and execution/evidence/qa-final-post-about-b/. The final comparison and limitations are documented there.

D7 · Deliver maintained proof and handoff

Let Matt review the result from one stable board.

2 / 2
Criteria, constraints and proof

Observable tests

Constraints

  • Matt explicitly authorized a Sol High executor on 2026-09-29 after adding the photo catalog. Reconcile current annotations and launch one executor, then keep this same board current.
  • Keep total task spending at or below USD 20 without further authority. No unsolicited security gate, no binding client commitments, permanent important-data deletion or unrelated changes.
Parent-verified evidence: The parent reviewed execution/executor-gist.md, execution/deliverables.md, execution/main-prompts.md, execution/current-session.md, execution/handoff.md, this board and all four public routes. The handoff includes URLs, source paths, all 15 comment dispositions, tested and untested outcomes, and exact restore steps. See /Users/agency/Documents/Agty/lovasember-project/outputs/lovasember-four-page-upgrade-2026-09-29/parent-acceptance.md. All 14 review-release criteria are checked, without implying production or conversion proof.
D7.1 proof · This published board retains the same URL, 14 criteria with 14 checked, final URLs, resources and the parent completion callout.

Next-stage decisions

Outside this review release
Next stage · Operational and approval decisions

All 14 review-release criteria are verified. The free leader email draft route is verified, while email receipt and a completed appointment remain untested. The paid self-knowledge Calendar is separate. The screenshot refund promise lacks dated policy evidence and is omitted from page copy. Client approval and production launch are separate future decisions.

Recovery state

Only inspect on stall or completion
0consecutive stalls
Review release completerecovery state
Choose a v2 directionresume point
Last stall / completion note: Four-route review deployment, audited copy, workbook addendum, desktop visual QA, functional clicks, blind screenshot comparison and 15-comment ledger are complete. All 14 review-release criteria are checked, including parent handoff review. The leader email route and its explanatory readback passed.
Parent action: Choose a v2 direction from the pink completion callout when ready. The free leader route opens an email draft, not a completed email or booking.